What makes an alarm actionable rather than noisy?
After this you can answer: What makes an alarm actionable rather than noisy?
Say it in 30 seconds
Section titled “Say it in 30 seconds”The deeper answer
Section titled “The deeper answer”The jobs-age threshold is 300 seconds. A growing queue can mean no consumer, throttling, slow downstream work or incoming load beyond completion capacity. The alarm signal does not by itself prove the cause.
The worker-errors alarm watches invocation-level errors. The handler catches message failures and returns partial failures, so failed emails can reach the DLQ while Lambda Errors remains zero. A DLQ message also does not prove no email was sent: a send may succeed before its completion record fails.
The ALB alarm adds target and load-balancer 5xx counts, firing at five errors in five minutes. That is a development threshold; a production rate or error-budget signal needs a request denominator and a defined objective. Missing-data behavior and confirmed SNS email subscription matter as much as the threshold. Ticket-consumer-specific SLOs and alerts are not implemented by these four email-oriented alarms.
Counter-questions
Section titled “Counter-questions”Would you page on every failed message?
Does an OK notification prove recovery?
What would you add first in production?
Where in MiniTickets
Section titled “Where in MiniTickets”Read the path chapter, select the relevant map piece →, then inspect infra/src/observability/alarm-specs.ts → alarmSpecs. Work through the related case for a diagnostic example.
Read this book online: https://book.theversehub.in/